Blepharoplasty Surgery in Sydney
All cosmetic surgery involves risks and individual results vary. The outcomes shown in any images on this page are relevant only to the specific patient depicted and do not reflect the results other patients may experience. Cosmetic surgery is a serious decision. Decisions about whether to proceed should be made after careful consideration and following at least two consultations with a qualified medical practitioner.
Blepharoplasty is surgery of the eyelids — removing or repositioning excess skin, muscle, and fat in the upper eyelids, lower eyelids, or both. It is among the most reliably satisfying procedures in facial surgery when the patient selection is right and the technical execution is precise. It can also have a meaningful functional dimension: significant upper eyelid hooding can obstruct the upper visual field, and where this is documented, the procedure may attract a Medicare rebate.
The assessment before blepharoplasty is at least as important as the surgery itself. The most common reason for a disappointing blepharoplasty result is not a technical failure — it is an incomplete pre-operative assessment that missed the contribution of brow descent to the upper eyelid picture, or that removed too much lower eyelid skin in a patient who needed fat repositioning rather than excision. Getting these assessments right at the outset is what the consultation is for.
Cosmetic surgery is a serious decision. Full information about the risks of blepharoplasty is available on the blepharoplasty risks page. Two consultations are required before any cosmetic procedure proceeds.
Understanding Eyelid Anatomy and Ageing
The upper and lower eyelids are anatomically distinct and age differently. Understanding this helps explain why the assessment and surgical approach for each differ — and why not every concern around the eye area is appropriately addressed by blepharoplasty alone.
The Upper Eyelid
The upper eyelid crease — the superior tarsal fold — sits 7–10 mm above the upper lash margin in most patients with European-heritage anatomy, slightly lower in men. Above this crease lies the preseptal orbicularis muscle, the orbital septum, and the preaponeurotic fat pads (typically medial and central). With age, the upper eyelid skin loses elasticity and becomes redundant; the orbital septum weakens and allows forward herniation of fat. The combination produces the characteristic hooding — excess tissue descending to or beyond the upper lash margin. In advanced cases it obstructs the lateral visual field, particularly on upward gaze, at which point the condition has a functional as well as cosmetic dimension.
The Lower Eyelid
The lower eyelid ages differently. The most characteristic change is prolapse of the three orbital fat compartments through a weakening septum — producing the “bags” that are among the most common aesthetic concerns around the eye. The lower eyelid orbicularis muscle can also descend and elongate, contributing to festoon formation — chronic, oedematous muscle rolls that are distinct from fat prolapse and more difficult to address surgically. Fine skin wrinkles on the lower eyelid, particularly lateral wrinkling, are better addressed by laser resurfacing than by surgical excision alone.
The Brow-Eyelid Relationship — A Critical Assessment Point
The relationship between brow position and apparent upper eyelid hooding is the most important — and most frequently overlooked — aspect of upper eyelid assessment. When the brow descends, it carries forehead and preseptal skin downward with it, creating the appearance of upper eyelid excess. If the eyelid is assessed without accounting for brow descent, the surgeon may plan an excision that temporarily resolves the hooding but fails to address its cause — and the excess skin reconstitutes within months as the descended brow continues to push tissue onto the eyelid.
The clinical test is straightforward: gently place the fingers above the brow and lift it to a natural position, then observe what happens to the upper eyelid. If the hooding substantially improves when the brow is elevated, brow position is a significant contributor and the primary treatment is a brow lift — either alone or combined with a conservative blepharoplasty for any true eyelid skin excess that remains once the brow is repositioned. The blepharoplasty excision in this combined situation must always be conservative, because the brow lift delivers additional skin once it is elevated.
Dr Roth assesses brow position as a standard component of every upper eyelid consultation and discusses the findings and their implications before any surgical plan is agreed.
Functional Versus Cosmetic Blepharoplasty — Medicare and Insurance
Upper eyelid blepharoplasty may be performed for functional reasons, cosmetic reasons, or both simultaneously.
Functional blepharoplasty is performed where excess upper eyelid tissue is causing a clinically significant visual field defect. Where the clinical criteria are met — typically the eyelid tissue descending to within 2 mm of the upper pupil margin at rest, confirmed by formal visual field testing — the procedure may be eligible for a Medicare Benefits Schedule rebate, with private health insurance potentially contributing to hospital and anaesthesia fees. Dr Roth will advise at consultation whether Medicare eligibility is likely and what documentation is required. Where one side meets the functional criteria and the other does not, Medicare applies to the functional side only.
Cosmetic blepharoplasty addresses appearance concerns without a documented visual field deficit. It is self-funded. The clinical standard of care is identical regardless of the indication.
Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty
Upper blepharoplasty is performed through an incision placed precisely within the natural upper eyelid crease. The position of this crease and the amount of skin to be removed are marked pre-operatively with the patient awake and upright, using calipers — a minimum of 20 mm of skin must be preserved between the lower brow margin and the upper lash line to ensure comfortable eye closure after surgery. Through the crease incision, excess skin and a conservative strip of orbicularis muscle are removed, prolapsed medial fat is cautiously reduced, and the incision is closed with fine sutures removed at five to seven days. The resulting scar sits within the crease fold and is typically very well concealed.
As a standalone procedure, upper blepharoplasty takes 45–60 minutes under general anaesthesia or deep sedation. It is commonly combined with lower blepharoplasty, brow lift, or facelift.
Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty
Lower blepharoplasty is technically more nuanced than upper blepharoplasty — the approach is tailored to each patient’s specific anatomy. Dr Roth’s standard approach for most patients is the transconjunctival technique with or without an external skin pinch.
Transconjunctival approach: The incision is on the inner surface of the lower eyelid, leaving no external scar. The fat compartments are accessed directly and either conservatively reduced or — where a hollow exists at the orbital rim below the bulge (the “tear trough”) — repositioned to fill this hollow. Fat repositioning rather than excision produces a more natural result in patients with tear trough hollowing, and avoids the skeletonised appearance that results from over-aggressive fat removal in the lower eyelid. In patients with primarily fat-related concerns and good skin quality, the transconjunctival approach alone is often sufficient.
External skin pinch: Where the lower eyelid skin has fine wrinkling or mild laxity without significant excess, a conservative skin pinch just below the lower lash margin can be added. The amount removed is deliberately small — the primary risk of lower lid blepharoplasty is skin over-excision, which causes lower lid retraction (ectropion or scleral show), and this risk is greatest with external approaches.
Transcutaneous approach: Where significant lower lid skin excess or muscle laxity is present, an external incision just below the lower lash margin allows direct access to skin, muscle, and fat. This is reserved for patients in whom this level of access is specifically needed — it provides the most surgical exposure but carries the highest risk of lower lid malposition and requires precise technique and appropriate patient selection.
Lower lid laxity is assessed with a snap test at every consultation. Where significant laxity is present, a canthopexy (tightening of the lateral canthal tendon) may be combined with blepharoplasty to support the lower lid and reduce post-operative malposition risk.
Dr Roth’s Clinical Perspective
The lower eyelid is where I see the most significant variation in approach between surgeons, and where I think the distinction between fat repositioning and fat removal matters most in practice. In a younger patient with early fat prolapse and no tear trough hollow, conservative fat reduction through a transconjunctival approach is straightforward and the results are consistently good. In an older patient who has both fat prolapse and a significant orbital hollow below it, simply removing the fat makes the hollow worse. Repositioning — moving the fat down and forward over the orbital rim to fill the hollow — is technically more demanding but produces a much more natural result. Knowing which situation you are dealing with is the assessment job.
On the upper eyelid: the single most common error I see in revision consultations is blepharoplasty performed without adequate assessment of brow position. Too much skin was removed from the eyelid because the surgeon was trying to address hooding that was coming from the brow, not the eyelid. Once that skin is gone you cannot put it back, and the patient is left with eyes that look dry or hollowed, difficulty closing comfortably, and in some cases, corneal problems. I am conservative with upper eyelid skin excision for this reason — it is always possible to remove more at a secondary procedure, but you cannot restore what has been taken.
The pre-operative marking — using calipers, taking the time to get it precise — is not a formality. It is probably the most important fifteen minutes of the whole procedure.
— Dr Jason Roth, MBBS, FRACS (ORL-HNS)
Blepharoplasty in Asian Eyelids
Blepharoplasty in patients of East Asian heritage requires specific consideration. In most Asian eyelids, the upper eyelid crease is either absent (a single eyelid) or lower and less distinct than in European anatomy — because the levator aponeurosis has fewer fibrous connections to the overlying skin, producing a less defined fold or none at all. A medial epicanthal fold is also commonly present, covering the inner corner of the eye and affecting its apparent shape.
Asian blepharoplasty — double eyelid surgery — creates or enhances the upper eyelid crease by establishing fibrous connections between the levator aponeurosis and the skin. This can be achieved by suture techniques alone (non-incisional) or through a formal incision (incisional double eyelid). Suture techniques may relapse; incisional techniques are more reliable and permanent. The choice depends on the degree of skin excess, fat volume, and the degree of stability required. Critically, the crease height planned for Asian blepharoplasty should be lower than in European blepharoplasty — applying a European crease position to an Asian eyelid produces an unnatural appearance. The epicanthal fold, if present, is assessed separately and addressed where clinically appropriate and desired by the patient.
What Blepharoplasty Cannot Achieve
Aligned expectations are essential to a satisfactory outcome. Blepharoplasty alone will not lift a descended brow — that requires a brow lift. It will not remove dark circles, which are a pigmentation issue rather than a structural one. It will not eliminate all lower eyelid wrinkles — fine skin wrinkling responds better to laser resurfacing. It will not correct festoons (oedematous orbicularis rolls), which require a specific and more complex approach. And it will not correct true eyelid ptosis — drooping from levator weakness — which is a separate condition managed by an oculoplastic surgeon through a different procedure.
If any of these concerns are present at consultation, Dr Roth will advise on the appropriate management and refer where relevant.
Recovery
The first three days involve the most bruising and swelling — more periorbital swelling than many patients anticipate, which responds well to cold compresses and head elevation. Sutures are removed at five to seven days. Most patients are socially presentable within two weeks, though residual swelling continues to resolve over one to three months and the final result is not apparent until six to twelve months. Upper eyelid scars sit within the natural crease fold and typically become very fine pale lines. Lower eyelid transconjunctival scars are internal and produce no external mark.
Contact lenses should not be worn for two weeks. Strenuous activity is avoided for one week. The results of blepharoplasty are long-lasting — most patients maintain their improvement for ten to fifteen years before revision is needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about blepharoplasty (eyelid surgery) answered by Dr Jason Roth, Specialist Otolaryngologist and Head and Neck Surgeon, Sydney.
The most reliable answer comes from a clinical assessment. The at-home test: place your fingers gently above the brow and lift it to a comfortable position, then observe what happens to the upper eyelid hooding. If the hooding substantially improves when the brow is elevated, brow position is a significant contributor. If there is still excess eyelid skin remaining with the brow held up, there is a true eyelid component as well. Many patients have both.
The important point is that treating the eyelid without the brow in a patient where brow descent is the primary driver of the hooding is one of the most common reasons for a blepharoplasty that disappoints — the result looks operated-on without looking improved, and reconstitutes quickly.
Possibly. If the upper eyelid tissue is causing a clinically significant visual field deficit — typically the eyelid descending to within 2 mm of the upper pupil margin at rest, confirmed by formal perimetry — you may meet the MBS criteria for a Medicare rebate. This is assessed at consultation. Where examination suggests eligibility is likely, visual field testing can be arranged. In patients who meet the criteria, the out-of-pocket cost of surgery is substantially reduced.
Upper blepharoplasty scars are placed within the natural eyelid crease, where they sit within the fold and are concealed by it. Over six to twelve months they become very fine pale lines that are not apparent in normal social interaction. Lower blepharoplasty scars — where the transconjunctival approach is used — are internal and produce no external scar at all. Where a small external skin pinch is added, the scar just below the lash line fades to an imperceptible line over months.
Upper blepharoplasty removes excess skin from the upper eyelid that creates hooding, folds onto the lashes, and can impair the upper visual field. It is performed through the natural crease and is a relatively straightforward procedure technically.
Lower blepharoplasty addresses under-eye fat prolapse (bags), tear trough hollowing, and lower lid skin laxity. It is technically more demanding — the approach depends on whether fat needs to be removed or repositioned, and whether skin needs to be addressed — and carries a higher risk profile if skin excision is misjudged. The two procedures are frequently combined in the same anaesthetic.
Over-correction of upper blepharoplasty — removing too much skin — produces a surprised or startled appearance and prevents complete eyelid closure, which risks corneal exposure. This is avoided by conservative pre-operative marking in the upright position and a minimum skin preservation threshold. Lower lid over-correction causes ectropion (outward turning of the lid). Both are consequences of poor surgical planning, not inherent outcomes of the procedure. Dr Roth is deliberately conservative with upper lid skin excision — it is always possible to remove more at a secondary procedure; it is not possible to restore what has been taken.
Yes. Blepharoplasty is very frequently combined with facelift, brow lift, and lip lift — addressing multiple components of facial ageing in a single anaesthetic. It can also be combined with rhinoplasty in patients addressing both concerns together. The procedures do not compromise each other and sharing an anaesthetic reduces the total number of procedures and recovery periods. The appropriate combination for your specific concerns will be discussed at consultation.
Most patients are socially presentable within ten to fourteen days. The detailed timeline: bruising and swelling are most prominent in the first three days; sutures come out at five to seven days; most residual bruising has resolved by two weeks; residual swelling continues to reduce over one to three months; the final result is not apparent until six to twelve months. Upper eyelid scars within the crease fade to very fine pale lines. Lower eyelid transconjunctival scars are internal and invisible.
Contact lenses should be avoided for two weeks. Strenuous activity for one week. Most patients return to desk work within seven to ten days.
Upper blepharoplasty results are long-lasting — most patients maintain their improvement for ten to fifteen years before revision is needed. Lower blepharoplasty with fat repositioning is similarly durable. The eyelids continue to age after surgery, but do so from the improved baseline established by the procedure. The results are permanent in the sense that you will always look better than you would have without the surgery at any given age.
Upper Blepharoplasty → | Lower Blepharoplasty → | Brow Lift Surgery → | Risks of Blepharoplasty → | Before & After Gallery →
About Dr Jason Roth
Dr Roth is a Sydney-based Specialist Otolaryngologist and Head & Neck Surgeon with fellowship training in facial plastic surgery from the United States and Europe. He performs upper and lower blepharoplasty as both standalone and combined procedures, and assesses the brow-eyelid relationship as a standard component of every upper eyelid consultation. He also manages complex revision cases including patients with previous over-correction from blepharoplasty performed elsewhere.
Specialist Otolaryngologist & Head and Neck Surgeon
Specialist registration — Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery
View full profile
